Cutting Through the Hell of the Medical-Industrial Complex
Sunday, January 31, 2021
COVID Tests Are Obviously BS! REP. STEPHEN LYNCH TESTS POSITIVE FOR COVID-19 AFTER HE RECEIVED TWO DOSES OF PFIZER VACCINE - DR. JUDY MIKOVITS WARNS THE WORLD - DON'T TAKE THE VACCINE!! HERE'S WHY.
Wednesday, January 27, 2021
Don't take the COVID vaccine!
Don't take the COVID vaccine! Forget the reports of bad reactions including death for a moment. How can one know if a novel vaccine will hurt them later on down the road? Vaccine side-effects many years later has a precedent...
Tuesday, January 26, 2021
HPV and Natural Alternatives to the HPV Vaccine
(NaturalNews) Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) is a relatively common sexually transmitted disease passed on through genital contact, usually by sexual intercourse. Some forms of the virus can cause vaginal warts (papillomas). Other forms of the virus can cause abnormal cell growth on the lining of the cervix that years later can turn into cancer. However, the infections are usually harmless and go away without treatment. The body's own defense system eliminates the virus. Often, women experience no signs, symptoms or health problems.
The median age of women when they are initially diagnosed with cervical cancer is 48 years. New cervical cancer cases and deaths are uncommon below the age of 35 and nearly nonexistent before the age of 20.
Cervical cancer is not as common as other types of cancer. Rates for skin cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer and breast cancer are much higher. In fact, women are nearly 15 times more likely to be stricken with breast cancer than with cervical cancer.
In the United States, an HPV vaccine -- Gardasil -- was licensed in 2006. It is designed to protect against just four of the more than 100 different HPV strains. Each dose contains polysorbate 80 and 225mcg of aluminum. In Europe, Cervarix is the licensed HPV vaccine. It is made by gene-cloning cells of Trichoplusia ni, a worm-like insect. This vaccine contains 500mcg of aluminum.
By February 2011, more than 20,500 adverse reaction reports pertaining to Gardasil were filed with the U.S. government -- an average of 12 reports per day [VAERS]. Nearly half of all reports required a doctor or emergency room visit, with hundreds of teenage girls and young women needing extended hospitalization.
In the case reports submitted to the FDA, 89 deaths were described due to blood clots, heart disease and other causes. In addition, many of the vaccine recipients -- young women -- were stricken with serious and life-threatening disabilities, including Guillain-Barre syndrome (paralysis), seizures, convulsions, swollen limbs, chest pain, heart irregularities, kidney failure, visual disturbances, arthritis, difficulty breathing, severe rashes, persistent vomiting, miscarriages, menstrual irregularities, reproductive complications, genital warts, vaginal lesions and HPV infection -- the main reason to vaccinate.
According to Dr. Diane Harper, director of the Gynecologic Cancer Prevention Research Group at the University of Missouri, 'The rate of serious adverse events [from Gardasil] is greater than the incidence rate of cervical cancer.' [ABC News (August 19, 2009).]
Gardasil is being promoted as 100 percent effective. However, this is a deceptive assessment of its true ability to protect against cervical cancer. Gardasil is effective against just two strains of cancer-causing HPV -- the ones included in the vaccine -- but researchers have identified at least 15 cancer-causing HPV strains!
Gardasil will not prevent infection with HPV types not contained in the vaccine. In fact, during clinical trials of the vaccine, hundreds of women who received Gardasil contracted HPV disease. Furthermore, the drug maker warns women (in its product insert) that 'vaccination does not substitute for routine cervical cancer screening.'
Gardasil is approved for girls and women ages 9 to 26. However, the vaccine is not effective in females who have already been exposed to the HPV strains included in the vaccine. In the United States, 24 percent of females are sexually active by age 15 years, 40 percent by age 16, and 70 percent by 18 years of age [Vital Health Statistics 23, 2004:1-48.]. Thus, lots of young teenagers have already been exposed to one or more of the HPV strains in Gardasil. This is why the American Cancer Society does not agree with the CDC's recommendation to vaccinate older teens and young women [Wall Street Journal (Apr 16, 2007):A1+.].
According to HPV expert, Dr. George Sawaya, who analyzed the pertinent HPV studies, the benefits of the vaccine are modest and the effect is fairly small. Therefore, 'The recommendation for widespread vaccination of women after they become sexually active may need to be rethought.' [Baltimore Sun (May 10, 2007).].
This vaccine is not only ineffective in women who have already been exposed to HPV strains included in the vaccine, but it may actually increase their likelihood of developing cervical cancer. In one study of women who tested positive for 'vaccine-relevant HPV' prior to receiving Gardasil, the vaccine had an efficacy of negative 45 percent (-45%). These women were significantly more likely (than women in the placebo group) to develop high-grade markers for cervical cancer. In a gross understatement, the FDA concluded that 'there is compelling evidence that the vaccine lacks therapeutic efficacy among women who have had prior exposure to HPV and have not cleared previous infection.' [FDA. May 18, 2006 VRBPAC Meeting: Table 17.]
Research has shown that when vaccines only target a small number of strains capable of causing disease, less prevalent strains can replace the targeted vaccine strains. These less prevalent strains graduate from minor factors to major influences and may even become more dangerous. Scientists are now concerned that Gardasil -- which only targets two of at least 15 different cancer-causing HPV strains -- might be allowing HPV strains previously considered minor to flourish and become major influences.
HPV vaccine alternatives:
Numerous studies show convincing evidence that diet and nutritional factors can prevent many types of cancer, including cervical cancer, and even eliminate precursors to this disease. Fruits and vegetables, especially, have been shown to have beneficial effects against malignancies [Nutrition and Cancer 1992;18:1-29.]. Among these nutritional factors, folate, or folic acid (a member of the B vitamins) has the most impressive record.
Several studies show that low folate levels increase the effect of other risk factors for cervical cancer, including that of HPV infection. Conversely, high folate levels appear to be beneficial against HPV lesions and other risk factors for cervical cancer. For example, in a recent study published in a leading journal on cancer, researchers found 'evidence of a protective role of folate' with regard to pre-malignant lesions of the cervix [Cancer Causes and Control (Nov. 2003);14(9):859-870.]. Several studies also show that folic acid supplementation can reverse cervical lesions in patients using oral contraceptives -- a known risk factor for this 'pre-cancerous' condition. Patients with mild and moderate cervical lesions showed a full reversal of their condition in just three months following a diet rich with folic acid. [Am J Obstet Gynecol. (Mar 1992);166(3):803-809; JAMA 1992;267:528-533; Am J Clin Nutr. (Jan 1982); 35(1):73-82.] Other studies confirm these results.
A study published in the International Journal of Cancer found that women who ate the least amount of tomatoes had nearly five times the risk for precancerous lesions [1991;48:34-38.]. Another study measured and compared micronutrient levels in the blood of women with cervical cancer to micronutrient levels in the blood of non-cancerous women. The women with higher levels of lycopene (found in tomatoes) and vitamin A consumed greater amounts of food with these substances and had one-third less chance of developing cervical cancer [Nutr. Cancer 1998;31:31-40.]. Another study, published in the American Journal of Epidemiology, concluded that low vitamin C intake is an independent contributor to higher-grade HPV lesions [Nov 1981;114(5):714-24.].
Summary:
* Cervical cancer is rare in younger females. Older women -- not preteen and teenage girls -- are most at risk for cervical cancer.
* Cervical cancer is not as common as other types of cancer.
* The HPV vaccine contains aluminum.
* The FDA has already received numerous reports of serious and life-threatening adverse reactions in recipients of the HPV vaccine.
* Some girls and young women developed genital warts, vaginal lesions and HPV infection after receiving the HPV vaccine.
* The vaccine may be linked to reproductive complications, including miscarriages and menstrual irregularities.
* The vaccine's highly publicized 98-100 percent efficacy rate does not,/i> refer to its ability to prevent cervical cancer. The vaccine is only designed to prevent a limited number of 'pre-malignant' lesions that often disappear or resolve on their own.
* The vaccine has never shown that it can actually prevent cervical cancer.
* The vaccine is only designed to protect against four of the more than 100 different strains of HPV.
* The vaccine is only designed to protect against two of the more than 15 different HPV strains able to develop into cervical cancer.
* The vaccine does not directly target at least 13 strains of cancer-causing HPV, so recipients of the shot may still get cervical cancer.
* The vaccine has no efficacy in females who have already been infected with HPV strains included in the vaccine. In fact, these women may have a greater risk of developing cervical cancer.
* The vaccine might be allowing HPV strains previously considered minor to flourish and become major cancer-causing influences.
* Numerous studies show that women who make a few simple changes in their diet may be able to eliminate precursors to cervical cancer and even prevent this disease.
About the author:
Neil Z. Miller is a medical research journalist and the Director of the Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute. He has devoted the past 25 years to educating parents and health practitioners about vaccines, encouraging informed consent and non-mandatory laws. He is the author of several books on vaccines, including Miller's Review of Critical Vaccine Studies: 400 Important Scientific Papers Summarized for Parents and Researchers (2016) and Vaccine Safety Manual for Concerned Families and Health Practitioners (2015). Past organizations that he has lectured for include the International Chiropractic Pediatric Association, the International College of Integrative Medicine, Maximized Living, Autism One, the Hahnemann Academy of North America, and Dr. Gabriel Cousens' Culture of Life Institute. Mr. Miller has a degree in psychology and is a member of Mensa.
Monday, January 25, 2021
Sunday, January 24, 2021
Colloidal Silver and Kidney Cancer
Colloidal Silver and Kidney Cancer
by Steve Barwick, author, The Ultimate Colloidal Silver Manual
Not too long back I received the following message from a gentleman who owns a Micro-Particle Colloidal Silver Generator from The Silver Edge. He wrote:
“One serious case of cancer I came into contact with was with a friend’s brother who had cancer of the kidney and was scheduled to have it surgically removed in four weeks.
I explained that I didn’t know if I could help him get rid of the cancer in that short a period of time (if at all), but that I’d give it my best shot. I used several protocols with this particular person:
1. Colloidal Silver Water several times daily in-between meals for the entire four week period.
2. Flor*Essence tea (Essiac) four times daily – an hour before each meal and before retiring. 2 ounces of pure spring water (no chlorinated water) stove-top heated (not micro-waved) mixed with 2 ounces of Flor*Essence tea. (Flor*Essence tea was learned from an Ojibway Indian and developed by Registered Nurse Rene Caisse and later perfected even further by Dr. Charles A. Brusch, President John F. Kennedy’s Physician, while JFK was in the White House. Dr. Brusch had cured his own intestinal cancer using Flor*Essence tea. Ms. Rene Caisse had cured tens of thousands of terminal folks from 1928 – 1978 at her clinic in Bracebridge, Canada.)
3. 10 grams of Vitamin C taken orally over the course of the day to strengthen his immune system. (Intra-venous {IV} vitamin C can help immensely, but I couldn’t find a practitioner to administer it).
4. A good muliti-vitamin and mineral capsule taken daily, again, to strengthen his immune system. Additional vitamin E, D, A, and selenium.
5. Dr. Hulda Clark’s 2004 “Zapper” using the Cancer program driver. He used the Zapper daily for the remaining three weeks after running the 8 day program (which is one session the first day, 2 sessions of the Zapper the second day with an hour in between sessions, 3 sessions the third day, an hour in between sessions, 4 and four, 5 and five, 6 and six, 7 and seven, and 8 sessions on the eighth day, again with an hour in between each session). so the last day it takes fifteen hours to complete the Zapper run. After the eight day run with the Zapper program, he used it off and on daily for the remaining three weeks.
6. Lots of raw vegetables and fruit daily.
He was very disciplined in using all of these protocols for the entire four weeks. When he went in for his surgery, the oncologists did a scan to locate all of the cancer, but the cancer was totally gone, to his and the doctor’s surprise, and they had to cancel the surgery!
In my opinion, it was the combination of all of these protocols including Colloidal Silver Water that saved his kidney from the ravages of cancer. This was a very tough situation because we had a very short time limit of only four weeks to work on ridding his body of the cancer.
I was as surprised as he and the doctors because of the short time span. He was very thankful about the outcome. But it proved to me once again, that it’s certainly possible to overcome cancer using natural, alternative methods.
To me, the optimal time to begin natural, alternative treatments is immediately after diagnosis before any allopathic treatments have been administered. Once chemotherapy begins, a person’s own immune system becomes weakened and impaired and then it becomes extremely difficult for the body to fight off the cancer.
I cannot guarantee that we’ll beat cancer every time we go after it with alternative methods, but I’ve seen and experienced success in defeating it many times with a number of different types of cancer (throat, tongue, brain, skin, stomach, bladder and intestines to name a few).”
— John S., Jamesville, NY
Another Interesting Case
The above testimonial was very surprising to me, of course. But not too much longer I received the following equally surprising message from another Micro-Particle Colloidal Silver Generator owner, this one age 87, who wrote:
“I was given 3 months to live in 2004 when they discovered I had stage 4 kidney cancer, aka renal carcinoma. I credit colloidal silver with much of the credit for surviving this long.
Here’s my story: I have not eaten a bite of food nor drank a glass of water in over a year. Impossible? NO! I drink all my food and water in the form of smoothies.
Micro-Particle Colloidal Silver is the first ingredient to go into the blender. Apple juice & water make up the 20 ounces of liquid. 5 stocks of asparagus, a big handful of spinach, some broccoli, celery, cucumber, a carrot, suffice for the veggie’s. ¼ cantaloupe, and some grapes do the fruit.
I lied a little because I do eat a banana, an orange and a slice of homemade whole wheat bread each day. I am well motivated to eat like this because it is keeping my renal carcinoma cancer in check.
At 87 I feel better than any of my other senior years. I spray silver water in my open eyes each day, some on my hair, brush my teeth with it, along with some in my arm pits and other vital places. I spray all my fruits and vegetables, counter tops, etc. with this great water.”
— Max H., West Murray, Utah
Testimonials, of course, however interesting they might be, are not evidence of clinical efficacy. So I decided to do some internet research in order to determine whether or not any clinical studies exist that demonstrate silver to be effective against renal (kidney) cancer cells.
An Interesting Clinical Study
And sure enough, there is one, published in December 2016 in the journal ScienceDirect.
The study is titled, “Fucan-Coated Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized by a Green Method Induce Human Renal Adenocarcinoma Cell Death,” which is quite a mouthful, I think you’ll agree. Let me synopsize the lengthy study and its results for you:
The researchers were studying a polysaccharide known as a “fucan A,” which is extracted from a seaweed known scientifically as Spatoglossum shroederi.
They state in the Abstract of their study that they knew from previous research this particular fucan “is non-toxic to rats when administered in high doses.” And they also knew that it “exhibits low toxicity against tumor cells.”
In other words, this polysaccharide from seaweed known as “fucan A” has already been demonstrated in animal studies to be safe to ingest. And it’s been previously demonstrated to have a very low level of effectiveness against tumor cells, when tested in laboratory “test tube” studies.
The researchers decided to see if they could increase the effectiveness of the seaweed extract (fucan A) against cancer cells by using it to synthesize silver nanoparticles in a process called “green synthesis.” This simply means that instead of using harsh chemicals to create silver nanoparticles out of silver ions, they instead used the seaweed extract.
Put another way, they used the seaweed extract (fucan A) to reduce silver ions into metallic silver nanoparticles that were essentially “capped” (coated) with the seaweed extract.
The researchers wrote:
“Studies have shown that the synthesis of silver nanoparticles with different molecules potentiates the activity of these molecules that are applied in areas such as cosmetics, medicine, and materials engineering.
Therefore, one way of increasing the antiproliferative activity of fucan A is the synthesis of silver nanoparticles with fucan A.”
Put another way, their operating theory was that synthesizing silver nanoparticles with seaweed extract (fucan A) might increase the ability of fucan A to stop cancer cells from multiplying.
In a laboratory “test tube” environment, the researchers then exposed the silver nanoparticles to a variety of human and animal cells, including “human renal adenocarcinoma (786-0) cells (ATCC CRL-1932),” which, of course, are human kidney cancer cells.
And what did they discover? They found that:
“…these nanoparticles did not show any toxic effects against various normal cell lines;
however, they decreased the viability of various tumor cells, especially renal adenocarcinoma cells 786-0.”
In other words, the capped silver nanoparticles had no toxic effect against normal human and animal cells. But they caused the renal (i.e., kidney) cancer tumor cells to die!
Finally, the researchers concluded:
“The data obtained herein leads to the conclusion that fucan A silver nanoparticles are promising agents against renal adenocarcinoma.”
This is critically important to understand, the researchers further stated, because:
“Renal adenocarcinoma (renal cancer) is the third major cause of urogenital tract cancer
…The recommended treatment is the surgical removal of the tumor because these tumors are resistant to radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
The development of compounds that are toxic against renal adenocarcinoma cells is therefore highly desirable.”
In other words, this is truly good news because this type of kidney cancer is “resistant to radiotherapy and chemotherapy” and can generally only be treated with risky surgery.
In the Conclusion to their study, the researchers summed everything up by stating:
“The synthesis of stable nanoparticles with silver and fucan A polysaccharide was successful.
These nanoparticles exhibited a higher cytotoxicity against tumor cells, especially human renal adenocarcinoma cells (786-0), than against non-tumor cells.
We also confirmed that NFucAs induce the necrosis of 786-0 cells but were not toxic against various non-tumor kidney cells.”
The bottom line is that while the seaweed extract, fucan A, was known to have very low toxicity against kidney cancer cells, when silver was brought into the picture the toxicity to the cancer cells increased significantly!
What’s more, the silver nanoparticles showed no toxicity to normal kidney cells!
Where to Learn More…
If you’d like to learn more about the effectiveness of colloidal silver and other forms of silver against cancer, you might want to acquire a copy of my latest book, Colloidal Silver and Cancer: a Surprising Look.
This brand new 126-page soft cover book brings you completely up-to-date on the use of colloidal silver and other forms of silver as a powerfully effective nutritional adjunct to cancer.
You’ll read overviews of 50 of the latest clinical studies demonstrating silver to be effective against over a dozen forms of cancer.
Plus, you’ll read 20 real-life reports from people who claim to have successfully cured their cancers using colloidal silver, or who have used colloidal silver to dramatically improve their conditions.
And you’ll read about an unusual medical investigational protocol for using colloidal silver against cancer, and the astonishing stories of healing involved.
For example, you’ll discover…
- Why one clinical researcher recently wrote, “Many attempts have been made to use silver as an anti-cancer agent and they have all turned up positive”.
- Why British researchers claim silver kills some cancer tumors better than chemotherapy, and with fewer side effects.
- Why one prominent cancer researcher is so enthused about using silver, he wrote, “We have chosen silver because it has anti-cancer activity but it’s inherently non-toxic to normal tissues.”
- Researchers reveal how silver appears to kill cancer cells without harm to normal human cells.
- Why scientists are now saying that “…old wives tales about the precious metal being a ‘silver bullet’ to beat the Big C could be true.
- The clinical trial that demonstrated silver to be “as effective as Cisplantin” (i.e., a prominent chemotherapy drug) against cancer, but without all of the nasty side effects!
- 13 different forms of cancer linked to infectious microbes or parasites (and the evidence for silver’s ability to eradicate them).
- Tip of the Iceberg: Why researchers say many other forms of cancer are likely being caused by underlying infections, and why colloidal silver’s well-known antimicrobial properties might just provide the perfect solution.”
- Why the World Health Organization now admits that “Viruses, bacteria and parasites emerge as the “‘secret agents’ causing millions of cases of cancer” each year.
- The surprising story of the cancer virus that contaminated our childhood vaccines for decades– and why this could be the reason incidents of cancer have skyrocketed since the 1950s.
- The little-known story of Dr. Robert Gallo’s search for a cancer-causing virus, and the surprising results.
- The research team that found cancer might start with microbes that have invaded your bloodstream, meaning the seeds of your own destruction may be within your veins. Why colloidal silver may be the best solution!
- How infections by fungal organisms mimic many forms of disease, including a variety of cancers.
- A surprising look at leukemia (blood cancer) and why silver’s well-known anti-fungal properties might make it the perfect nutritional adjunct for this blood cancer scourge.
- The Canadian college student who might hold the cure for “incurable” childhood cancers: why silver is his main focus of research!
- How Dr. Robert O. Becker, M.D. used electrically generated silver to revert cancer cells back to normal cells in the 1970’s.
- How silver makes cancer cells commit cellular suicide (i.e., apoptosis), while not harming normal cells.
- The amazing story of how 30 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer and confirmed by mammogram and biopsy were all cured of their cancers within just 19 days of treatment with colloidal silver!
- The man who cured his own prostate cancer with oral doses of colloidal silver, then sent some to his cancer-stricken brother, who was also cured!
- The man who cured his friend’s wife of breast cancer, using colloidal silver and a special “tea”!
- The story of a severe case of kidney cancer being cured in only four weeks, using colloidal silver along with some vitamins, herbs and dietary changes!
- The man who cured his cat of stomach cancer, using colloidal silver!
- How a single daily teaspoon of colloidal silver has kept this man’s pancreatic cancer in remission for the past nine years!
- The man who cured his skin cancer with colloidal silver!
- The 87 year-old woman who says, “Colloidal silver helps keep my renal carcinoma in check, so much so that I feel better than many of my other senior friends!”
- The 81-year old veteran who “cured an unusual case of lymphoma cancer” using colloidal silver!
- The Hodgkin lymphoma cancer patient who avoided radiation therapy by using colloidal silver to shrink his tumor!
- The 18 year old woman diagnosed with a brain tumor; how the tumor was reduced to a mere lesion in only six months, thanks to daily colloidal silver usage!
- The cancer patients who swear colloidal silver eliminated their excruciating cancer pain!
- And many, many other real-life examples, testimonials and personal accounts!”
Why Haven’t You Heard About This?
So why haven’t you heard about this plethora of clinical studies proving beyond any shadow of a doubt that silver is one of nature’s most powerful natural anti-cancer substances?
It’s because the powers-that-be don’t want this earth-shattering information to get out. That’s why.
The medical community is making billions upon billions of dollars annually performing expensive and painful surgeries or selling toxic chemotherapy drugs and dangerous radiation treatments that are often worse than the cancer itself.
But you’ll have this invaluable inside information right at your fingertips on silver’s astonishing ability to wipe out cancer, when you get a copy of Steve’s new book.
Get a Copy for HALF-PRICE
(Next 10 Days Only!)
Colloidal Silver and Cancer: a Surprising Look is regularly priced at $49.95 per copy, and is a bargain at that price.
But for a very limited time only — until April 7, 2019 — you can obtain a copy at HALF PRICE if you order from this web page.
You pay only $24.95 by acting quickly and decisively while it’s still on sale. Note: In the not-to-distant future, the book’s price is going to be increased to $79 per copy.
To get a copy of this first-of-its-kind book documenting the irrefutable and clinically proven fact that silver kills cancer cells, shrinks cancer tumors and can be used as an effective anti-cancer agent, simply click the link below:
Or call toll-free, M-F, 8am to 4pm, and order with your credit card:
1-888-846-9029
Meanwhile, I’ll be back next week with another insightful article on colloidal silver…
Yours for the safe, sane and responsible use of colloidal silver,
Steve Barwick, author
Saturday, January 23, 2021
WOMEN'S SPORTS ARE OVER! ALL ABOUT JOE BIDEN'S NEW GENDER DISCRIMINATION EXECUTIVE ORDER
WOMEN'S SPORTS ARE OVER! ALL ABOUT JOE BIDEN'S NEW GENDER DISCRIMINATION EXECUTIVE ORDER
Friday, January 22, 2021
There is no evidence that any virus causes any disease - David Icke talks to Dawn Lester, co-author of 'What really makes you ill'
There is no evidence that any virus causes any disease - David Icke talks to Dawn Lester, co-author of 'What really makes you ill'
Thursday, January 21, 2021
Wednesday, January 20, 2021
Sunday, January 17, 2021
Friday, January 15, 2021
Thursday, January 14, 2021
THIS IS WHAT THE PFIZER COVID19 VACCINE HAS DONE TO MY MOM. EVERYONE PLEASE PRAY FOR HER.
THIS IS WHAT THE PFIZER COVID19 VACCINE HAS DONE TO MY MOM. EVERYONE PLEASE PRAY FOR HER.
Thursday, January 7, 2021
Tuesday, January 5, 2021
PFIZER-VACCINE-DEATH-DATA-REPORT-DECEMBER-2020
Pfizer-Vaccine-Death-Data-Report-December-2020
Download the full report: https://www.fda.gov/media/144246/downloadThe document is 92 pages long, there were 43,252 participants in the trials (apparently) and the calculation is based on this. That said, Pfizer themselves stated that not all participants made it to stage 3 - Several thousand dropped out due to adverse reactions, yet they don't make that clear in their report (which is obvious as to why they would not show that).
The figures you see can easily be verified by using the calculation shown in the video - This is Pfizers own numbers, not ours, so in true the real death rates are likely to be much more higher. In fact only yesterday it was announced that one more Brazilian male died from the Pfzier trials which substantially alters Pfizers own figures.