By Linda Feldmann December 10, 2014 8:32 AM
news.yahoo.com
Specifically, a press summary of the spending bill posted online by the House Appropriations Committee says it “prohibits both federal and local funds from being used to implement a referendum legalizing recreational marijuana use in the District.”
Advocates of voting rights for the District’s 646,000 residents are outraged.
news.yahoo.com
In November, the District of Columbia voted to legalize recreational use of marijuana, but a new congressional budget deal has a provision barring implementation.
When residents of the District of Columbia
voted to legalize recreational use of marijuana last month, cannabis
fans cheered. Then they quickly realized that Congress – which has
oversight over D.C.’s affairs – could overrule the will of the voters.
Now,
it appears, that fear will come true sooner than expected – not in the
next Congress, when Republicans will control both chambers, but during
the lame duck session currently under way.
Tuesday
night, Senate Democrats and House Republicans reached a deal to fund
the federal government through Sept. 30 of next year. That means no
government shutdown. But the deal’s fine print also includes a provision
that bars implementation of Initiative 71, the marijuana legalization
measure D.C. voters approved by a 2-to-1 margin on Nov. 4.
Specifically, a press summary of the spending bill posted online by the House Appropriations Committee says it “prohibits both federal and local funds from being used to implement a referendum legalizing recreational marijuana use in the District.”
Advocates of voting rights for the District’s 646,000 residents are outraged.
“If
reports are true, members of Congress from both parties bargained away
the rights of the people of the District of Columbia and in doing so
compromised the core democratic values of the United States,” Kimberly Perry, head of the group D.C. Vote, said in a statement to The Washington Post.
Efforts
to secure full voting representation in Congress for D.C. residents
have a long history of frustration. The reality is that the federal
enclave is not a state, and therefore its residents do not enjoy the
same voting rights of states, as granted by the US Constitution. The
Constitution also grants Congress jurisdiction over the District.
In
1973, Congress established “home rule” in D.C., allowing local
officials to govern the District. But Congress maintains the right to
overrule local decisions, including ballot measures.
Most of the time, Congress leaves D.C. alone, but on social policy, congressional Republicans
have been known to jump in. On abortion policy, the District is not
allowed to use its own tax revenues to fund the procedure for low-income
residents. Republicans in Congress blocked sales of medical marijuana
in D.C. for 11 years.
In the
current Congress, Rep. Andy Harris (R) of Maryland is spearheading the
effort to thwart legalized recreational marijuana in D.C. He claims
“fairly broad-based support in Congress against legalization.”
But marijuana advocates aren’t taking this lying down.
“Tonight we march!” tweeted Adam Eidinger, Chairman of the DC Cannabis Campaign, Wednesday morning.
Tonight we march! “@whiteknightpua: can we rally a protest on the Hill?
Maybe have people set up camp outside Andy Harris' offices?”— Adam
Eidinger (@aeidinger) December 10, 2014
The march Wednesday evening
will begin at the Justice Department and end at Capitol Hill, and civil
disobedience that could lead to arrests.
Related:
Medical Marijuana - Cerebral Palsy (Jacqueline Patterson)
A Drop at a Time: How Cannabis Oil is Changing Lives of Cancer Patients in the UK
The Effect of Cannabis on Pregnant Women & Newborns
Related:
Medical Marijuana - Cerebral Palsy (Jacqueline Patterson)
A Drop at a Time: How Cannabis Oil is Changing Lives of Cancer Patients in the UK
The Effect of Cannabis on Pregnant Women & Newborns