Transcript of World Renowned Oncologist Connects Covid Vaxx To Cancer Explosion!
And why would a booster allow a cancer to come back? Well, it turned out it's very simple that boosters suppress the T-cell response. The first two will increase it a bit, but a booster suppresses it. And that's exactly what we found. But then a group from Madrid published a wonderful paper saying T-cell exhaustion after third COVID vaccine in cancer patients with an incredible data. Show it showed it very, very clearly. And so therefore any cancer suppressed and controlled by the immune system, you suspect might pop up after the booster. >> So, I want to remind people how we got the mRNA vaccine. It was never tested successfully and the vaccine they never had a successful coronavirus vaccine. Um and but they really, really wanted to push this mRNA vaccine. And this is from from the Milken Institute with Dr. Fauci and he's telling you how they're going to have to scare the hell out of people and make them more afraid of a coronavirus than they should be so then they can institute uh the the rollout of mRNA shots. I don't even call them vaccines. But let's listen, it's very short. >> Why don't we blow the system up? I mean, obviously we can't just turn off the spigot on the system we have and then say, "Hey, everyone in the world should get this new vaccine we've been giving to anyone yet." But there must be some way that we grow vaccines mostly in eggs the way we did in 1947. >> You know why? Because we've been proven that that that works and it's less toxic than an mRNA. So, he's saying, "Why can't we just force this?" He Do you hear him? "Why do we just force this on everybody? Why don't How do we got to get off the old vaccines that everybody's used to taking in their flu shot? We got to get something new on them." And here's what Fauci says. >> In order to make the transition from getting out of the tried and true egg growing, which we know gives us results that can be, you know, beneficial. I mean, we've done well with that, to something that has to be much better. Uh you have to prove that this works. And then you've got to go through all of the clinical trials, phase ones, phase twos, phase three, and then show that this particular product is going to be good over a period of years. >> Of Of Of course, they didn't do that with the mRNA vaccine. It was rushed through as called Warp Speed. Is there a better way to bring a medicine to market than at warp speed? And so, of course, they didn't do any of that, like he said. What did they do instead? >> That alone, if it works perfectly, is going to take a decade. >> They might >> Okay, so it didn't. They did it in 3 months. So, it did They didn't take a decade to study the vaccine. They just rushed it through, and here we go. >> a need or even an urgent call for an entity >> Right. >> of excitement out there that's completely disruptive, that's not beholden to bureaucratic strings and and and processes. >> So, >> You mean like a pandemic that's manufactured by this guy inventing a virus at the University of North Carolina, shipping it to Wuhan lab, and then having it get out accidentally get out and create a pandemic so we can have this new thing that is not uh subject to bureaucratic strings. Here's what he says about that. >> We really do have a problem of how the world perceives influenza, and it's going to be very difficult to change that unless you do it from within and say, I don't care what your perception is, we're going to address the problem in a disruptive way and in an iterative way because >> Which is exactly what they did with COVID. I don't care what If If not afraid of coronavirus, we're going to make you afraid of it, and we're going to do it in a disruptive way. Was there ever a bigger disruption in humanity than the lockdowns from COVID? I don't think so. And so, there he is telling you their plan, and that's just like a year before the the the pandemic. >> need both, but it is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of an novel avian virus could occur in in China somewhere. We could get the RNA sequence from that, beam it to a number of regional centers, if not local, if not even in your home at some point, and print those vaccines on a patch and self-administer. >> So, if that doesn't tell you exactly that they had this in mind and planned, they were talking about it in front of cameras with microphones. They were admitting their heinous evil plan. They're admitting it. That's what that is. And so, now we have doctors, the leading oncologists in the world, here's one of them, Dr. Professor Angus I can't pronounce his last name. How do you say his last name, Nick? >> Dalgleish. >> Dalgleish. So, he's [snorts] going to let you know that from his observational studies, he has drawing a connection between the mRNA vaccines and cancer. Now, let's watch. >> thing that people who've been stable with cancer melanoma for years started relapsing at the beginning of '22. And I asked for any reason why this might occurred, and I noticed they'd all been given boosters by their GPs, which I would if they'd asked me, I wouldn't have done that. And so, we had to look around. What's the reason? Why would a booster allow a cancer to come back? Well, it turned out it's very simple that boosters suppress the T-cell response. The first two will increase it a bit, but a booster suppresses it. And that's exactly what we found. But then a group from Madrid published a wonderful paper saying T-cell exhaustion after third COVID vaccine in cancer patients with an incredible data showing showed it very very clearly. And so therefore any cancer suppressed and controlled by the immune system, you suspect might pop up after the booster. Surgeons noted their colorectal patients were not were very difficult to treat. They were presenting late and they were presenting young. And they found that these patients had all had the booster, too. And they called you know, a red flag. And I called a red flag that just the suspicion that the the vaccine might be involved in the cancer. >> Are there any studies that have linked to the mRNA to cancer? Is there any sort of medical um um process that you can allude to that >> The strongest are the epidemiological studies. And uh the strongest was from Japan, a paper by Gibo and and his colleagues, which just had the raw data. And they noticed that the number of new cancer cases went up with each booster vaccine. >> So, again, this goes against the orthodoxy. And of course we now know that not only medical boards, but the the medical journals are completely corrupted by Big Pharma money and universities as well because they all relied on Dr. Fauci to fund their research and give them billions of dollars. And so now when a guy like this comes out and says this, they all attack him as he's some kind of a quack. But uh just what what's your reaction to when you hear this, Nick? >> Yeah, everything he says is 100% accurate. In fact, now over 70% of the global population was injected with a carcinogenic biological agent. And that biological agent is the mRNA gene transfer injections. We actually now have over 100 studies showing that the mRNA shots induce cancer or promote cancer by a 17 distinct mechanisms. He mentioned T-cell exhaustion was one of them. You also have turning off of tumor suppressor genes P53 and BRCA, hyperinflammation, overall immune dysregulation, um as well as just literally decimating uh multiple organ systems at the same time because it goes everywhere in the body. And you know, it's just a massive list. It's an absolutely massive list of mechanisms, but you know, the epidemiological data is undeniable. We have four major major data sets. And there's two in the United States. The first is the CDC Wonder mortality data. There's been 138,000 excess cancer deaths in the United States since the mRNA shots rolled out. Again, 138,000 more cancer deaths than normal. And then we had the SEER data set come out of the National Cancer Institute a few months ago. They found that multiple major cancers increased in young Americans right after the shots rolled out, including stomach cancer, colon cancer, brain tumors. They were up about 19%. Um so this should not be occurring. And then we had lastly Italian and South Korean studies totaling 8.7 million people combined comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated. And the vaccinated individuals suffered increased risks of seven major cancers, uh colon, prostate, breast, thyroid. Um all these cancers are up in the vaccinated. So, it's undeniable both mechanistically and at the population level. >> So, there's a chemical called SV40. Now, tell me about that and why has this been found inside the COVID vaccine? >> Yeah, SV40 is a portion of the DNA plasmid at the manufacturing process for the Pfizer mRNA injections. Basically, it's there to churn It's there in the DNA plasmid at the factory to churn out the mRNA, to help churn it out. The DNA plasmids are still in the vials. They don't clean them out. They say they do, but they don't. Over 10 studies have found these DNA plasmids, including SV40 segment of the plasmids in the vials. And so, when you inject it into people's arms, it's encased in the lipid nanoparticles. And we know SV40 is a cancer-promoting genetic material. And so, that's going to get into all of your bodily systems and promote cancer. And actually, it's possibly inserting itself into genomes, portions of this DNA plasmid. And we demonstrated that in a peer-reviewed study. We found a segment of this so-called vaccine genetic material fused in chromosome 19 in a stage four turbo bladder cancer patient. And so, you know, it's it's very bad. It's very, very bad. And that's another mechanism of promoting cancer is insertional mutagenesis or genomic integration of non-human synthetic vaccine DNA, um causing uncontrolled cell growth. >> And so, here's the South Korean study you were talking about. One year risk of cancers associated with COVID-19 vaccination, a large population-based cohort study in South Korea, and I'll just read you a couple of lines from this. Uh the uh oxygenetic potential of SARS-CoV-2 has been hypothetically proposed, but real-world data on the COVID-19 infection and vaccination are insufficient. Therefore, this large-scale population-based retrospective study in Seoul, South Korea aimed to estimate the cumulative incidences of subsequent risks of overall cancers 1 year after COVID-19 vaccination. Data from over 8 million individuals between '21 and '23 were obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance database. The participants were categorized into two groups based on their COVID-19 vaccination status. The risks for overall cancers were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. And data were expressed as hazard ratios with a 95% confidence uh uh interval. The thyroid cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer significantly increased at a 1-year post-vaccination. So, I That's a gigantic study, 8 million people. And so, why do you Why do you think that today this is still happening? That they're still giving out free vac co- mRNA COVID vaccines at CVA. What is going I mean, is is our government just that eagle evil or they just that corrupt or both? >> It's both. It's both. And honestly, I don't have a good answers to why they're doing this. It It It's now at this point with all this evidence, it does qualify as a form of homicide. It may be mass negligent. Um we don't know yet. You know, that has to be um kind of rolled out. You know, what what sort of crime is being committed here now because we know it's causing these cancers. We know it's actually caused mass deaths, extreme blood clotting including white fibrous clots. A study came out on that 2 days ago. 25% of corpses have these long anomalous clots in them now. 75% of embalmers are finding them. Um and yeah, so it's criminal. We now we know the FDA literally covered up 25 safety signals in early 2021. Ron Johnson's team found that out with internal communications of between FDA officials. They literally buried a sudden cardiac death signal. It was killing people, children, teenagers, everybody. And they told the scientist that found those signals to cease and desist, right? So, that is a crime to hide uh death signals from a product you're telling millions of people to get. >> And so people have been attacking that professor. And so I asked Grok, please answer my question succinctly that that professor who's the the oncologist, the world-renowned oncologist who's correlating and connecting the the shots with cancer. And I said, please answer my question as succinctly as possible without adding commentary or qualifiers. The people attacking the professor, world-renowned oncologist, were wrong about most things to do with COVID in retrospect, like lockdown, school closures, vaccine stopping transmission and contraction, and social distancing, correct? Grok says, yes. So, there you go. The when you So, when you see someone like that on social media, and then you see him being attacked, remember the people attacking him were wrong about everything to do with COVID. You'll see You'll see posts You'll see posts like this. Uh he's a world-renowned grifting quack. >> [laughter] >> Right? That's what people say. They go uh and so uh I asked I asked Rock. I said, "Is Is this world-renowned oncologist uh really world-renowned? Is he a leader in the field who was well-respected before he spoke out on COVID?" Yes. He is a legitimate, well-respected oncologist with a strong pre-COVID reputation in his field. He's not fringe or unknown. And here's his credentials. He's got great, unbelievable credentials. He's held senior roles in oncology and immunology for decades. And he's discovered of CD4 as a major receptor for HIV. He pioneered work on cancer immunotherapy and vaccine. And he's contributed to the development of something I can't promo promote pronounce which led to him receiving the Joshua Lederberg Prize in 2011. Um I could go on and on. He's got a great reputation. And I said, "Well, is he a quack?" They go, "No, he's not a quack. He's credentialed in career. He's the founding chair of oncology at St. George's University of London since 1991. He's a fellow of respected bodies, the Academy of Medical Sciences, Royal Colleges. Extensive publication record, hundreds of papers he's published, strong citations in immunology and oncology, and contributions to HIV research and cancer immunotherapy. His uh pre-COVID standing, respected in his niche for tumor immunology, cancer vaccines, HIV. Colleagues viewed Colleagues viewed him as a productive clinic clinician scientist. So, of course, after he came out and went against the orthodoxy and told the truth about his findings with cancer and the jabs, now they're calling him a quack. That That's the We've seen this over and over. Not only Dr. McCollough, leader in his field, but anybody the guy who's what's his name who invented the mRNA vaccine technology. We've had him on the show. Dr. Robert Malone, right? Again, the guy who has vaccine patents, the guy who invented the mRNA vaccine platform that was based that that they used the covid shot based on they're not calling him a quack. So anybody who goes against Big Pharma's narrative, they're going to call a quack. I just wanted to show people that that one of the most leading oncologists in the world, they'll also try to dismiss. And what do you think it's going to take, Nick? What do you think it's going to take for regular people to realize that they were lied to about covid on a scale their brains cannot comprehend. >> It's going to take an injury or death in their family from one of these products, I think in the end, particularly for those who have received six, seven, eight, nine mRNA booster shots. While something bad may not have happened to them or somebody they know, the moment something does, that's when most people wake up and that's what I've seen. Now, but it's very sad for people who have taken six booster shots. An autopsy study recently came out and found basically their hearts look like a Swiss cheese under the microscope, not with holes, but with multiple micro scars. And so these shots literally cause little microscopic scars throughout the heart that lead to sudden death. >> Do you think we'll ever have a a person who's you know, what like when Walter Cronkite turned on the Vietnam War, that's what they said it was the end of the Do you think that there'll be someone who's respected in society that comes out and says something about this? That people will finally wake up. >> It's going I think it's going to have to come from the propaganda mainstream media outlets that these individuals religiously watch. It's going to have to come from CNN and all these other outlets, unfortunately. [snorts] And so, but they're captured by Big Pharma, by they're captured by Pfizer. And so, you know, it's going to be very difficult to get that to happen. Uh, but it needs to happen for the sake of public safety. You know, we have a an ongoing uh, long-term mass casualty event, right? We have to put an end to it somehow. >> Nicholas Holschur, uh, at the McCullough Foundation. I appreciate you uh, taking time to help explain all this to everybody. Uh, everybody should follow you on uh, X on Twitter @NickHolschur. And uh, thanks again for taking time for us, pal. >> Thank you. >> Okay. Hey, come see me on tour. We'll be in Burbank, California August 30th with the live celebrity panel show. And then September 18th through the 20th in Chicago, Illinois and Rosemont, Illinois. Go to jimmydore.com for a link for tickets. >> [music]
No comments:
Post a Comment